Q: Can a Council member request an extra detailed report at the AGM?

Short answer: No — a Council member cannot demand an extra detailed report at the AGM, nor can they block or delay acceptance of the Treasurer’s Report by insisting on additional documentation. They may ask questions for clarification, but they cannot require new reports, expanded reports, or additional financial documents before the AGM proceeds.

This is one of the strongest procedural protections in the FMCA Constitution.

Clear constitutional basis

1. AGM business is strictly limited to what is already on the agenda

Rule 35 defines the business of the AGM:

“To consider the Auditor’s Report and Statement of Receipts and Expenditure.”

This means:

There is no constitutional mechanism for a member to demand additional reports.

2. No new business may be introduced without due notice

Rule 35(e):

“Any other business of which due notice has been given.”

A demand for an extra report is new business. If it was not included in the notice convening the AGM, it cannot be introduced.

This is your strongest procedural shield.

3. Members may ask questions — but only for clarification

Rule 35(b) requires the AGM to consider the Auditor’s Report. “Consider” means:

It does not mean:

Questions are allowed. Demands are not.

4. The Treasurer’s Report cannot be held hostage

Nothing in the Constitution allows a member to:

The AGM must proceed according to the agenda.

5. If a member wants more detailed reporting, they must follow Rule 59

Rule 59 requires:

This is the only way to change reporting requirements.

A member cannot impose new reporting obligations “on the spot.”

Practical interpretation (Chair)

Allowed:

Not allowed:

The Chair has full authority to refuse such demands.